Per ABC news, Palin insists, despite evidence to the contrary, that she opposed Bridge to Nowhere (and that she opposes outrageous Congressional spending).Question: THEN WHY DID PALIN SPEND THE $200 MILLION ANYWAY????
Update: It's not the actual concept of earmarks that kills her, its the abuse! The abuse of it all!
So, students, please note that spending taxpayer money to study the sex lives of crabs is not abuse. Sex with crabs, however...
Speaking of exoskeletons, Senator McCain has decided, per the AP, to support the current highway bill, including all of it's earmarks. That's an $8 billion dollar bill. I'm sure there's no abuse in it though. Definitely, maybe.
So we're back to defintions. The Republicans love them the word play. What is "abuse"? What is "imminent"?
What is the "Bush Doctrine"?
Take it away, Sarah!
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment